Obama is asked by fawning press, “Are you comfortable?” The video start in the middle, but still gives a good view of the media of this year’s campaigns bias. To see the whole video go to AlterNet Blogs The Media has never played to a candidate like this before. They refuse to look at his record, and don’t look the Obama/Rezko problem. They don’t look at his experience record, or his lack of it, for that matter. They just by into the “Obama is the Messiah” hype. Just wait until the actual race if Obama gets the nomination. He will crumble under John McCain, who has REAL experience.

Obama’s health care plan is not what he says it is. His stance on the Iraq War was not what he said it was. In 2004 he wanted to hit Iran and maybe Pakistan with Missiles. His budget plan is insane, adding $860 Billion in the next ten year for… Global Poverty!! Obama supports Partial Birth abortion, a practice most liberals are disgusted by!

Senator Obama is NOT WHAT HE SAYS HE IS!! Please, for America’s future, look at the FACTS!!

No Comments »

From TimJ 

Barack Obama is running a campaign of CHANGE. Change in tactics, change in policies, and change in your wallet. You see, you hand Barack Obama a dollar and all you’ll get is CHANGE back. Senator Obama would like for you to believe that he’s fiscally responsible. After 4 years of an Obama presidency, I believe he would be responsible… for the most socialistic policies ever seen before in the US. Here’s an excerpt from his website:

Make the Tax System More Fair and Efficient

• End Tax Haven Abuse: Building on his bipartisan work in the Senate, Obama will give the Treasury Department the tools it needs to stop the abuse of tax shelters and offshore tax havens and help close the $350 billion tax gap between taxes owed and taxes paid.
  
• Close Special Interest Corporate Loopholes: Obama will level the playing field for all businesses by eliminating special-interest loopholes and deductions, such as those for the oil and gas industry.
  

Doesn’t that SOUND responsible? What does it actually mean in Continue Reading »

No Comments »

During a speech the other day, Michelle Obama said she is proud of the U.S. for the first time in her life.  The FIRST TIME IN HER LIFE!!!  What a thing for the wife of a presidential candidate to say!!

Why is she proud of America for the FIRST time??? Because her husband, Barack Obama, has got millions of young people fooled enough to vote for him.   She says the reason she is proud is because people want a change.  I agree, we need change. But NOT the change Barack Obama wants to bring to this country! (See Obama’s Gloomy Big Goverment Plan, and Do Obama’s Supporters Really Know Him?) It would ruin America!

First, Obama has virtually no experience for the Presidency. He spent 7 years as a junior Senator in Illinois, and 2008 would be his fourth year as Illinois Senator in Washington. During his time as U.S. Senator he had exactly one bill, co-sponsored by a Republican, enacted into law. (Since he’s been running for president full-time for the last year, I’m not counting that last 12 months.) He did better as a State Senator–which is a part time job in Illinois, but there was only one bill of his that a governor signed, one that required videotaping police interrogation in potential death penalty cases, that can be called groundbreaking. 1

On a different post we talked about how the Government is already spending way more than it should be, (see Obama bill: $845 billion more for global poverty) and Obama just wants to up it more! Like WAY more, he wants to increase the budget by $840 Billion, not including the $845 Billion for global poverty!!  Obama is NOT the right man for the presidency.  Give him 10 more years of experience, and a governorship if Illinois, then let him run again!  NOT now!

Video Link: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4f9af_obama_news?from=rss
 

No Comments »

From New York Times

–

The principal policy division between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama involves health care. It’s a division that can seem technical and obscure — and I’ve read many assertions that only the most wonkish care about the fine print of their proposals.

But as I’ve tried to explain in previous columns, there really is a big difference between the candidates’ approaches. And new research, just released, confirms what I’ve been saying: the difference between the plans could well be the difference between achieving universal health coverage — a key progressive goal — and falling far short.

Specifically, new estimates say that a plan resembling Mrs. Clinton’s would cover almost twice as many of those now uninsured as a plan resembling Mr. Obama’s — at only slightly higher cost.

Let’s talk about how the plans compare.

Both plans require that private insurers offer policies to everyone, regardless of medical history. Both also allow people to buy into government-offered insurance instead.

And both plans seek to make insurance affordable to lower-income Americans. The Clinton plan is, however, more explicit about affordability, promising to limit insurance costs as a percentage of family income. And it also seems to include more funds for subsidies.

But the big difference is mandates: the Clinton plan Continue Reading »

No Comments »